Notes

• [1]
  Hassenteufel P., Les médecins face à l’État, Paris, Presses de Sciences Po, 1997.
• [2]
  Starr P., The social transformation of American medicine: the rise of a sovereign profession and the making of a vast industry, New York, Basic, 1992.
• [3]
  Cohu S., Lequet-Slama D., « Le système d’assurance santé aux États-Unis : un système fragmenté et concurrentiel », Études et Résultats, 600, septembre 2007.
• [4]
  Henry Kaiser Family Foundation, Summary of coverage provisions in the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act and the Health Care and Education Reconciliation Act of 2010, Washington DC (www.kff.org/ health reform).
• [5]
  Rosenbaum S., « A “customary and necessary” program – Medicaid and health care reform », New Eng. J. Med., 362, 1952-1955, 27 mai 2010.
• [6]
  Ces estimations proviennent de l’administration fédérale, Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services. Voir : Gruber J., « The cost implications of health care reform », New Eng. J. Med., 362, 2050-2051, 3 juin 2010.
• [7]
  Blumenthal D., Morone J., The heart of power: health and politics in the oval office, Berkeley, University of California Press, 2010.
• [8]
  Marmor T., The politics of Medicare, 2^nd ed., Hawthorne, Aldine de Gruyter, 2000.
• [9]
  Bjorkman J.W., « Politicizing medicine and medicalizing politics: physician power in the United States », in : Freddi G. et Bjorkman J.W. (Eds.), Controlling medical professionals: the comparative politics of health governance, Newbury Park, Sage, 1989.
• [10]
  Tabuteau D., Rodwin V., À la santé de l’Oncle Sam : regards croisés sur les systèmes de santé américain et français, Paris, Jacob-Duvernet, 2010.
• [11]
  Keyhani S., Federman A., « Doctors on coverage – Physicians’ views on a new public insurance option and Medicare expansion », New Eng. J. Med., 361, e24, 1^er octobre 2009.
• [12]
  Antiel R. et al., « Physicians’ beliefs and US health care reform – A national survey », New Eng. J. Med., 361, e23, 1^er octobre 2009.
• [13]
  Laugesen M.J., Rice T., « Is the doctor in? The evolving role of organized medicine in health policy », J. of Health Politics, Policy and Law, (28) 2-3, 2003.
• [14]
  Freidson E., Professional dominance: the social structure of medical care, New Brunswick, Transaction Publishers, 1970.
• [15]
  Morone J., The democratic wish, New York, Basic, 1990, chap. 7.
• [16]
  Stevens R., « Public roles for the medical profession in the United States: beyond theories of decline and fall », Milbank Q., 79 (3), 2001.
• [17]
  Peterson M., « Political influence in the 1990s: from iron triangles to policy networks », J. of Health Policy, Politics and Law, 18, 395-438, 1993.
• [18]
  Baumgartner F.R., Leech B.L., Basic interests: the importance of groups in politics and political science, Princeton, Princeton U. Presss, 1998.
• [19]
  Skocpol T., Boomerang: health care reform and the turn against government, New York, WW Norton, 1996.
• [20]
  Daschle T., Critical: what we can do about the healthcare crisis, New York, Thomas Dunne Books, 2008.
• [21]
  Tabuteau D., Rodwin V., À la sante de l’Oncle Sam …, op. cit.
• [22]
  Sack K., « Texas battles health law even as it follows it », New York Times, 28 juillet 2010.
• [23]
  Jost T., « Can the states nullify health care reform? », New Eng. J. Med., 362, 103-105, 11 mars 2010.
• [24]
  Skocpol T., « The political challenges that may undermine health reform », Health Affairs, 29, 1288-1292, juillet 2010.
• [25]
  www.physicians foundations.org/ PressReleaseDetails. aspx?id=250
• [26]
  www.nytimes. com/2011/01/07/ opinion/07brooks. html?_r=1&ref =davidbrooks