<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
    <title>Le monde complexe des idéologies | Cairn.info</title>
    <icon>https://shs.cairn.info/build/assets/cairn-B7RWiji2.png</icon>
    <id>tag:cairn.info,2005:rss/liste-lecture/415670</id>
    <rights>Cairn.info 2026</rights>

    <link href="https://stm.cairn.info/rss/liste-lecture/415670" rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" />
    <link href="https://stm.cairn.info?lang=en" type="text/html" />

    <updated></updated>

                            <entry>
    <id>tag:cairn.info,2005:article:QUAD_070_0069</id>
    <title type="html"><![CDATA[
        Idéologies et hégémonie&#160;: la classe dirigeante au prisme des
think tanks |
        Think tanks, experts et pouvoirs
                    | Quaderni
            (2009/3 n° 70)
            ]]></title>
        <link href="https://shs.cairn.info/revue-quaderni-2009-3-page-69?lang=fr" type="text/html" rel="alternate" />
    <published>2009-09-01T00:00:00+02:00</published>
    <updated>2023-07-04T09:50:40+02:00</updated>
            <summary type="html"><![CDATA[This article seeks to rethink the world of think tanks as a
sub-space constituting the ﬁeld of power; growing links of this
sub-space with media industry, economy and politics being expressed
and consolidated through the seamless movement of certain social
agents. These representatives of the ﬁnancial bourgeoisie have in
fact a purely instrumental relation with liberalism, their
pragmatism being well accommodated with a social discourse of
public regulation. In this perspective, the denunciation of think
tanks as a preferred vehicle for liberal ideology ignores the role
of think tanks in the construction, reproduction and dissemination
of a hegemonic discourse—that of capitalism—which uses both market
idolatry and State fetishism.]]></summary>
    </entry>
                                <entry>
    <id>tag:cairn.info,2005:article:QUAD_072_0047</id>
    <title type="html"><![CDATA[
        Les médiamorphoses du (néo)libéralisme. Propagande, idéologie
dominante, pensée unique |
        Propagandes en démocratie
                    | Quaderni
            (2010/2 n° 72)
            ]]></title>
        <link href="https://shs.cairn.info/revue-quaderni-2010-2-page-47?lang=fr" type="text/html" rel="alternate" />
    <published>2010-06-01T00:00:00+02:00</published>
    <updated>2023-07-04T09:50:23+02:00</updated>
            <summary type="html"><![CDATA[Intangible form of ideology, the (neo)liberal «&#160;?single
thought?&#160;» is the symbol of a disembodied and faceless market,
evoking an elusive representation of power, between dispersal,
extinction and dissolution&#160;; the exact opposite, in somehow,
of the propagandist imaginary linked with an instrumentalist and
intentionalist representation of power. Acting by mere contagion,
without institutional mediation, the «&#160;?single
thought?&#160;», ahistorical and anti-sociological concept, is a
form of alienation of ideology. This paper also shows how confusing
an economic system with its philosophical justification, opponents
and proponents of (neo)liberal globalization appear to be the two
poles of the same encompassing speech. In this sense, if the utopia
of market society is alien to real capitalism, it still ful­fills a
specific function&#160;: to confuse the latter with its
philosophical justification described as propaganda, dominant
ideology or even «&#160;?single thought?&#160;».]]></summary>
    </entry>
                                <entry>
    <id>tag:cairn.info,2005:article:REDP_305_0005</id>
    <title type="html"><![CDATA[
        Capital et idéologie en Chine&#160;: retour sur les estimations et
conclusions de Thomas Piketty |
        Varia
                    | Revue d&#039;économie politique
            (2020/5 Vol. 130)
            ]]></title>
        <link href="https://shs.cairn.info/revue-d-economie-politique-2020-5-page-683?lang=fr" type="text/html" rel="alternate" />
    <published>2020-11-12T00:00:00+01:00</published>
    <updated>2023-07-04T09:49:10+02:00</updated>
            <summary type="html"><![CDATA[Since the beginning of the reform and openness policy, China has
experienced tremendous economic transformation which cannot be seen
anywhere in the history of modern societies. Understanding the
speed, the scope and the stability of the Chinese economic miracle
is still a challenge for social scientists, and more particularly
for those who analyze the relationship between capital and
ideology. Recently, Thomas Piketty dedicated one chapter to income
inequalities in China. His estimations indicate that income
inequalities have plateaued since the mid-2000s at a level below
the United-States. Piketty concludes that China is not tolerant of
income inequality. This article analyzes the data and methods used
by Piketty. Then, it proposes an alternative evaluation of
household income inequality using the Gini index. Based on the
China Family Panel Survey, it shows that income inequality has
increased until the end of the 2000s, and have been plateaued since
then at a level which exceeds the one of the United States. Those
estimations corroborate the conclusion of numerous specialists of
income inequality in China who demonstrated that Chinese people
mostly perceive income inequality as a prerequisite to economic
development.]]></summary>
    </entry>
                                            <entry>
    <id>tag:cairn.info,2005:article:DROZ_CAILL_1986_01_0213</id>
    <title type="html"><![CDATA[
        Idéologie et régimes des idées |
        Splendeurs et misères des sciences sociales
                    (1986)
            ]]></title>
            <subtitle type="html">
            <![CDATA[]]>
        </subtitle>
        <link href="https://shs.cairn.info/splendeurs-et-miseres-des-sciences-sociales--9782600041164-page-213?lang=fr" type="text/html" rel="alternate" />
    <published>1986-01-01T00:00:00+01:00</published>
    <updated>2023-07-04T09:46:24+02:00</updated>
    </entry>
                                <entry>
    <id>tag:cairn.info,2005:article:AMX_043_0096</id>
    <title type="html"><![CDATA[
        Qu'est-ce que la critique de l'idéologie&#160;? |
        Critiques de l'idéologie
                    | Actuel Marx
            (2008/1 n° 43)
            ]]></title>
        <link href="https://shs.cairn.info/revue-actuel-marx-2008-1-page-96?lang=fr" type="text/html" rel="alternate" />
    <published>2008-08-05T00:00:00+02:00</published>
    <updated>2023-07-04T09:44:33+02:00</updated>
            <summary type="html"><![CDATA[What is the critique of ideology&#160;? Two paradoxes seem to
characterise the method of the critique of ideology. The first has
to do with the fact that ideologies are “both true and false”
(Adorno). The second has to do with the fact that the critique of
ideology seems to carry both a normative and a descriptive
dimension. The article argues that these two paradoxes disappear
when the critique of ideology is addressed by way of a Hegelian
mode of immanent critique. Such an approach highlights both the
specific normative claim of the critique of ideology and the
specific problematic which it exemplifies.]]></summary>
    </entry>
                                <entry>
    <id>tag:cairn.info,2005:article:PUF_ALTHU_2011_01_0204</id>
    <title type="html"><![CDATA[
        De l'idéologie |
        Sur la reproduction
                    (2011)
            ]]></title>
            <subtitle type="html">
            <![CDATA[]]>
        </subtitle>
        <link href="https://shs.cairn.info/sur-la-reproduction--9782130590798-page-204?lang=fr" type="text/html" rel="alternate" />
    <published>2011-09-28T00:00:00+02:00</published>
    <updated>2023-07-04T09:43:55+02:00</updated>
    </entry>
                                <entry>
    <id>tag:cairn.info,2005:numero:PUF_ALTHU_2022_01</id>
    <title type="html"><![CDATA[
        Socialisme idéologique et socialisme scientifique
                    (2022)
            ]]></title>
            <subtitle type="html">
            <![CDATA[et autres écrits]]>
        </subtitle>
        <link href="https://shs.cairn.info/socialisme-ideologique-et-socialisme-scientifique--9782130804710?lang=fr" type="text/html" rel="alternate" />
            <published>2022-10-28T00:00:00+02:00</published>
                <updated>2023-07-04T09:42:51+02:00</updated>
                <summary type="html"><![CDATA[<p>En 1966, Louis Althusser a 48 ans. Auréolé de l’énorme succès de
Pour Marx et de Lire «&#160;Le Capital&#160;», il se lance dans une
vaste recherche sur la possibilité d’une théorisation de
l’idéologie. La thèse qu’il avance se résume en une phrase&#160;:
l’idéologie est une pratique matérielle dont les fondements sont
pour l’essentiel inconscients. L’homme étant un «&#160;animal
idéologique&#160;», il ne peut pas être question d’échapper à
l’idéologie. Mais il est possible d’élaborer un savoir scientifique
de l’idéologique et du réel, susceptible de nourrir un projet
d’émancipation sociale dont le but serait la création d’une société
sans classes. Dans Socialisme idéologique et socialisme
scientifique et autres textes, le philosophe jette ainsi les
linéaments d’une théorie de la pratique politique qui renoue avec
l’horizon révolutionnaire alors abandonné par le PCF – un horizon
qui devra passer, selon lui, par la lutte idéologique avant toute
autre. À l’heure où l’idéologie a pris, par la grâce des réseaux
sociaux et des médias de masse, un visage ubiquitaire, ses
enseignements sont plus vitaux que jamais.</p>
]]></summary>
        <content type="html"><![CDATA[
        <ul>
                            <li>
                     Pages 3 to 6| Pages de début
                                    </li>
                            <li>
                     Pages 7 to 39| Préface
                                            |  Fabio Bruschi
                                    </li>
                            <li>
                     Pages 41 to 54| Présentation de <i>Socialisme idéologique et socialisme
scientifique</i> et de «&#160;L’idéologie&#160;»
                                            |  G. M. Goshgarian
                                    </li>
                            <li>
                     Pages 57 to 104| Chapitre I. Le socialisme idéologique
                                            |  Louis Althusser
                                    </li>
                            <li>
                     Pages 105 to 118| Chapitre II. Ligne de démarcation théorique, ligne de démarcation
de classe
                                            |  Louis Althusser
                                    </li>
                            <li>
                     Pages 119 to 158| Chapitre III. [La découverte du jeune Marx, la topique, l’histoire]
                                            |  Louis Althusser
                                    </li>
                            <li>
                     Pages 159 to 181| L’idéologie
                                            |  Louis Althusser
                                    </li>
                            <li>
                     Pages 183 to 188| Présentation de «&#160;Analyse du Comité Central
d’Argenteuil&#160;», «&#160;Lettre aux camarades du Comité Central
du Parti communiste français&#160;», «&#160;Entretien avec W. (2
juillet 1966)&#160;»
                                            |  G. M. Goshgarian
                                    </li>
                            <li>
                     Pages 189 to 197| Analyse du Comité Central d’Argenteuil
                                            |  Louis Althusser
                                    </li>
                            <li>
                     Pages 199 to 239| Lettre aux camarades du Comité Central du Parti communiste français
                                            |  Louis Althusser
                                    </li>
                            <li>
                     Pages 241 to 258| Entretien avec W. (2 juillet 1966)
                                            |  Louis Althusser
                                    </li>
                            <li>
                     Pages 259 to 261| Présentation de «&#160;Comment définir la “culture”&#160;»&#160;?
                                            |  G. M. Goshgarian
                                    </li>
                            <li>
                     Pages 263 to 272| Comment définir la «&#160;culture&#160;»&#160;?
                                            |  Louis Althusser
                                    </li>
                            <li>
                     Pages 273 to 276| Présentation de «&#160;Sur la Révolution culturelle&#160;» et
«&#160;Sur l’idéologie&#160;»
                                            |  G. M. Goshgarian
                                    </li>
                            <li>
                     Pages 277 to 312| Sur la Révolution culturelle
                                            |  Louis Althusser
                                    </li>
                            <li>
                     Pages 313 to 323| [Sur l’idéologie] (fragment inédit de «&#160;Sur la Révolution
culturelle&#160;»)
                                            |  Louis Althusser
                                    </li>
                            <li>
                     Pages 325 to 325| Remerciements
                                            |  Fabio Bruschi,  G. M. Goshgarian
                                    </li>
                            <li>
                     Pages 327 to 331| Pages de fin
                                    </li>
                    </ul>
    ]]></content>
</entry>
                                <entry>
    <id>tag:cairn.info,2005:article:PARL2_035_0131</id>
    <title type="html"><![CDATA[
        Le projet idéologique du bloc élitaire |
        Le progressisme existe-t-il ?
                    | Parlement[s]
            (2022/1 N° 35)
            ]]></title>
        <link href="https://shs.cairn.info/revue-parlements-2022-1-page-131?lang=fr" type="text/html" rel="alternate" />
    <published>2022-03-10T00:00:00+01:00</published>
    <updated>2023-07-04T09:41:54+02:00</updated>
            <summary type="html"><![CDATA[Emmanuel Macron’s power has been established and strengthened by
the constitution of a historical bloc, a contemporary application
of the concept forged by Antonio Gramsci. The elite bloc thus has
an incarnation, as well as a political form aggregating elements
from the left and the right, an ideology and a sociological base.
The latter is tripartite, combining around the real elites on the
one hand the managerial class, and on the other a significant mass
of pensioners. This bloc is coherent and stable over time,
preventing the reconstitution of the traditional left-right divide
on a national scale. It is the bearer of a project for a profound
overhaul of French society, which places it under pressure. In the
absence of an appropriate political response, sporadic revolts are
gradually giving way to a phenomenon of large-scale anomie.]]></summary>
    </entry>
                                <entry>
    <id>tag:cairn.info,2005:article:EMS_DOSQU_2017_01_0009</id>
    <title type="html"><![CDATA[
        Chapitre 1. De l’idée à l’idéologie politique |
        Marketing et communication politique
                    (2017)
            ]]></title>
            <subtitle type="html">
            <![CDATA[]]>
        </subtitle>
        <link href="https://shs.cairn.info/marketing-et-communication-politique--9782847699975-page-9?lang=fr" type="text/html" rel="alternate" />
    <published>2017-03-28T00:00:00+02:00</published>
    <updated>2023-07-04T09:41:22+02:00</updated>
    </entry>
                                <entry>
    <id>tag:cairn.info,2005:article:CITE_092_0127</id>
    <title type="html"><![CDATA[
        L’extrémisme&#160;: représentation et anathème |
        Raisons et passions écologiques
                    | Cités
            (2022/4 N° 92)
            ]]></title>
        <link href="https://shs.cairn.info/revue-cites-2022-4-page-127?lang=fr" type="text/html" rel="alternate" />
    <published>2022-09-27T00:00:00+02:00</published>
    <updated>2023-07-04T09:40:33+02:00</updated>
    </entry>
                                <entry>
    <id>tag:cairn.info,2005:article:HUMA_313_0024</id>
    <title type="html"><![CDATA[
        L'extrémisme insaisissable |
        Les limites de l'extrême
                    | Humanisme
            (2016/4 N° 313)
            ]]></title>
        <link href="https://shs.cairn.info/revue-humanisme-2016-4-page-24?lang=fr" type="text/html" rel="alternate" />
    <published>2016-11-01T00:00:00+01:00</published>
    <updated>2023-07-04T09:39:34+02:00</updated>
    </entry>
                                <entry>
    <id>tag:cairn.info,2005:article:RAI_011_0149</id>
    <title type="html"><![CDATA[
        Le paradoxe de l'idéologie revisité par Paul Ricœur |
        Le corps du libéralisme
                    | Raisons politiques
            (2003/3 n<sup>o</sup> 11)
            ]]></title>
        <link href="https://shs.cairn.info/revue-raisons-politiques-2003-3-page-149?lang=fr" type="text/html" rel="alternate" />
    <published>2003-08-01T00:00:00+02:00</published>
    <updated>2023-07-04T09:37:18+02:00</updated>
            <summary type="html"><![CDATA[Abstract In restoring the concept of ideology, Paul Ricœur
endeavors to resolve its inherent paradox, demonstrated by
K.&#160;Mannheim. Indeed, everything happens as if all criticism of
ideology was suspected in itself of belonging to an ideology. To
escape from this vicious circle, P.&#160;Ricœur follows neither the
line engaged by marxist «&#160;science&#160;», neither the line
inspired by sociology of knowledge for which he shows the aporetic
nature in both respects. The original contribution of the hermeneut
consists in solving the paradox of ideology, in drawing in the
resources of a political philosophy. Confronted with the
inoperative science/ideology opposition, Ricœur prefers to
implement subtle dialectics between utopia and ideology. In other
words, a criticism of ideology is only conceivable on the basis of
a utopian reflection which keeps the social order out of reach in
proposing a «&#160;liberating horizon&#160;».]]></summary>
    </entry>
                                <entry>
    <id>tag:cairn.info,2005:article:SDR_006_0299</id>
    <title type="html"><![CDATA[
        La reconnaissance d’«&#160;une écologie intégrale&#160;» par
l’Église catholique ou la négation de l’idéologie écologiste
française |
        Démocratie, théologie politique, théologie du politique depuis
Vatican II en France, en Allemagne et en Italie
                    | Société, droit et religion
            (2016/1 Numéro 6)
            ]]></title>
        <link href="https://droit.cairn.info/revue-societe-droit-et-religion-2016-1-page-299?lang=fr" type="text/html" rel="alternate" />
    <published>2016-01-03T00:00:00+01:00</published>
    <updated>2023-07-04T09:35:44+02:00</updated>
    </entry>
                                <entry>
    <id>tag:cairn.info,2005:article:RFHIP1_044_0093</id>
    <title type="html"><![CDATA[
        La création des verts&#160;: une intégration idéologique de
l’écologie politique&#160;? |
        REVUE FRANCAISE D'HISTOIRE DES IDÉES POLITIQUES - 44
                    | Revue Française d&#039;Histoire des Idées Politiques
            (2016/2 N° 44)
            ]]></title>
            <subtitle type="html">
            <![CDATA[]]>
        </subtitle>
        <link href="https://shs.cairn.info/revue-francaise-d-histoire-des-idees-politiques-2016-2-page-93?lang=fr" type="text/html" rel="alternate" />
    <published>2016-12-01T00:00:00+01:00</published>
    <updated>2023-07-04T09:35:06+02:00</updated>
            <summary type="html"><![CDATA[Creating “Les Verts”&#160;: an ideological integration of political
ecology&#160;? Deprived of mature political culture as a movement,
political ecology was a theoretical melting pot aggregating
elements of various origins, from the effervescent “68 Years” to
the “naturalist” tradition of nature conservation associations.
From 1984 onward, “Les Verts” undertook to bestow some form of
order to this motley corpus, in order to build up as coherent as
possible a political discourse. This kind of ideological
integration contributed to reinforce their political identity on
the electoral scene.]]></summary>
    </entry>
                                <entry>
    <id>tag:cairn.info,2005:article:RES_P1996_14N77_0191</id>
    <title type="html"><![CDATA[
        La contagion des idées (Dan Sperber) |
        Les usages d'Internet
                    | Réseaux
            (1996/3 n° 77)
            ]]></title>
        <link href="https://shs.cairn.info/revue-reseaux1-1996-3-page-187?lang=fr" type="text/html" rel="alternate" />
    <published>1996-06-01T00:00:00+02:00</published>
    <updated>2023-07-04T09:34:25+02:00</updated>
    </entry>
                                <entry>
    <id>tag:cairn.info,2005:article:ANSO_101_0063</id>
    <title type="html"><![CDATA[
        De la nature des croyances collectives |
        Les croyances collectives
                    | L&#039;Année sociologique
            (2010/1 Vol. 60)
            ]]></title>
            <subtitle type="html">
            <![CDATA[]]>
        </subtitle>
        <link href="https://shs.cairn.info/revue-l-annee-sociologique-2010-1-page-63?lang=fr" type="text/html" rel="alternate" />
    <published>2010-06-10T00:00:00+02:00</published>
    <updated>2023-07-04T09:34:07+02:00</updated>
            <summary type="html"><![CDATA[AbstractCollective beliefs were an important topic for sociology
since its official institution by Durkheim. However, sociologists
have not yet reached a consensus on the right way to study them.
For some, they are a matter of disposition acquired during
socialization. For other, they are based on good reasons that the
analyst has to make explicit. The aim of this article is to show
that these oppositions are mainly grounded on the fact that this
notion refers to different phenomena. Once these different kinds of
beliefs have been identified, it appears that only a
multidisciplinary approach can give a full account of collective
beliefs.]]></summary>
    </entry>
                                <entry>
    <id>tag:cairn.info,2005:article:PHOIR_058_0005</id>
    <title type="html"><![CDATA[
        Éditorial |
        La Gauche et la Droite
                    | Le Philosophoire
            (2022/2 n° 58)
            ]]></title>
        <link href="https://shs.cairn.info/revue-le-philosophoire-2022-2-page-5?lang=fr" type="text/html" rel="alternate" />
    <published>2022-11-22T00:00:00+01:00</published>
    <updated>2023-07-04T09:33:19+02:00</updated>
    </entry>
                                <entry>
    <id>tag:cairn.info,2005:article:SH_LHERE_2017_02_0017</id>
    <title type="html"><![CDATA[
        Penser les idéologies politiques |
        Les grandes idées politiques
                    (2017)
            ]]></title>
        <link href="https://shs.cairn.info/les-grandes-idees-politiques--9782361064488-page-17?lang=fr" type="text/html" rel="alternate" />
    <published>2017-10-01T00:00:00+02:00</published>
    <updated>2023-07-04T09:29:46+02:00</updated>
    </entry>
                                <entry>
    <id>tag:cairn.info,2005:article:EMS_GILBE_2021_01_0092</id>
    <title type="html"><![CDATA[
        Chapitre 4. L’idéologie&#160;: des pensées pour gérer |
        Lire le management autrement
                    (2021)
            ]]></title>
            <subtitle type="html">
            <![CDATA[]]>
        </subtitle>
        <link href="https://shs.cairn.info/lire-le-management-autrement--9782376874577-page-92?lang=fr" type="text/html" rel="alternate" />
    <published>2021-12-01T00:00:00+01:00</published>
    <updated>2023-07-04T09:29:30+02:00</updated>
    </entry>
            </feed>
