Cardiac adverse events associated with anti-PD-1 therapy in patients treated for advanced melanoma: relevance of dosing troponin T levels
- By Camille Scard,
- Jean-Michel Nguyen,
- Emilie Varey,
- Ibtissam Moustaghfir,
- Amir Khammari
- and Brigitte Dréno
Pages 205 to 212
Cite this article
- SCARD, Camille,
- NGUYEN, Jean-Michel,
- VAREY, Emilie,
- MOUSTAGHFIR, Ibtissam,
- KHAMMARI, Amir
- and DRÉNO, Brigitte,
- Scard, Camille.,
- et al.
- Scard, C.,
- Nguyen, J.-M.,
- Varey, E.,
- Moustaghfir, I.,
- Khammari, A.
- and Dréno, B.
https://doi.org/10.1684/ejd.2021.4009
Cite this article
- Scard, C.,
- Nguyen, J.-M.,
- Varey, E.,
- Moustaghfir, I.,
- Khammari, A.
- and Dréno, B.
- Scard, Camille.,
- et al.
- SCARD, Camille,
- NGUYEN, Jean-Michel,
- VAREY, Emilie,
- MOUSTAGHFIR, Ibtissam,
- KHAMMARI, Amir
- and DRÉNO, Brigitte,
https://doi.org/10.1684/ejd.2021.4009
1 Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) targeting cytotoxic T lymphocyte antigen-4 (CTLA-4) and programmed death-1/ligand-1 (PD-1/PDL-1) have considerably improved the management of metastatic melanoma as well as many other cancers [1]. However, these new drugs may engender new adverse events (AEs), especially immune-related adverse events (irAEs) which have been shown to be relatively unpredictable [2].
2 In patients treated with ICIs, we have witnessed an emergence of AEs affecting various organs [3], with cutaneous side effects being the most common (43-45%). Gastro-intestinal [4, 5] and endocrine disorders (6-8%) [6, 7] were also found. IrAEs tend to be less common in patients treated with anti-PD-1 than with anti CTLA-4 [8].
3 Cardiac toxicities and side effects associated with chemotherapy are well-established [9]. In all of the first clinical trials involving anti-PD-1 treatment for advanced and metastatic melanoma, there were no reports of cardiac effects [10-16]. Those associated with ICIs and, particularly with anti-PD-1, have been recently reported in clinical practice. Regarding cardiac AEs, several cases of fulminant myocarditis have been described [17-19] as well as less frequent AEs such as heart rhythm disorders, heart failure, pericarditis and vasculitis [20-25]. Unlike other irAEs, cardiovascular AEs tend to occur early after ICI initiation, usually between 17 and 39 days [26-28].
4 Auto-immune myocarditis associated with ICIs have shown poor prognosis with a 40% mortality rate [20, 29, 30]. It has been shown that patients developing immune cardiomyopathy have a significantly higher risk of developing myositis, encephalitis and hepatitis [31]. In the literature, myocarditis prevalence has been found in 1% of patients treated with all ICIs (0.5% for anti-PD-1 alone) among whom 50% will develop severe cardiac toxicity [32].
5 Although most patients experience mild to moderate symptoms, such as dyspnoea, chest pain, palpitations or myalgia, patients can have a non-symptomatic presentation, making early diagnosis difficult [27]. In the first clinical trials involving anti-PD-1, there was no routine testing for myocarditis by either biochemical analysis or cardiac imaging, which may well explain the scarcity of cardiac effects reported.
6 There are no clear guidelines for how patients treated with anti-PD-1 should be monitored (electrocardiogram [ECG] and troponin levels). Nor is there any precise recommendation for the therapeutic options that might be considered. Most irAEs require ICI discontinuation along with the use of oral steroids, and the adjunction of other immunosuppressive drugs if needed [33].
7 Cardiac troponins are biomarkers with a major role in the diagnosis of cardiac injuries. The troponin regulatory complex includes troponin C and troponin I that inhibit actin-myosin coupling through the inhibition of ATPase activity along with troponin T (TnT) that binds to tropomyosin and stabilizes the complex on the actin filament. When disruption of the myocyte membrane occurs, the troponins in the cytosol pass into the bloodstream. Increased troponin levels correlate with the extent of cellular injury. Thus, elevated cardiac troponin levels have a strong correlation with adverse cardiovascular outcome whether coronary artery disease is present or not. Troponins are present in both skeletal and cardiac muscles, and their levels increase during myocarditis and heart rhythm disorders [34]. Cardiac troponin T is also detectable in the blood of patients with chronic kidney disease [35].
8 Serum troponin T levels could be an interesting and simple tool in the diagnosis of anti-PD-1-related myocarditis as they are abnormal in more than 90% of patients developing this side effect, even in those presenting few or no cardiac symptoms [36].
9 In this article, we report firstly the frequency of myocarditis in our cohort of patients, and subsequently we investigate whether troponin levels before and during anti-PD-1 therapy might help predict cardiac immune side effects.
Materials and methods
First part: retrospective study
10 This was a retrospective study of 183 patients treated in our dermato-cancerology department with anti-PD-1 for an advanced Stage IIIC unresectable or IV (AJCC 8th) melanoma, between November 2017 and January 2020.
11 All patients included in this study were selected from the RIC-Mel network database (network for Research and Clinical Investigation on Melanoma, NCT03315468) and were treated in our department. All patients included in the database had given informed consent to participate. The database which was set up in 2012 had been approved by French health and ethics authorities (Comité Consultatif sur le Traitement de l’Information en matière de Recherche dans le domaine de la Santé–CCTIRS, file number 12.108, approval on 9 February 2012 and Commission Nationale de l’Informatique et des Libertés–CNIL, decision reference DR-2012-259, approval on 28 May 2012). The database is available online, and each participating centre has its own access codes.
12 The aim of this retrospective study was to determine adverse cardiac outcome and ascertain whether there was need for a prospective study.
Second part: prospective study
13 Taking into account the abnormal troponin T levels noted in the retrospective study, we decided to conduct a prospective study, focusing on the troponin T level.
14 Between November 2017 and November 2018, 52 patients from our department, with advanced or metastatic melanoma, were enrolled, and patient consent was obtained.
15 Inclusion criteria were patients suffering from Stage IIIc unresectable or IV melanoma (AJCC 8th) and who started treatment with anti-PD-1 immunotherapy validated by the multidisciplinary staff. Patients may have received previous lines of anti-cancer treatments. Those previously treated with anti-PD-1 for any other type of cancer were excluded. To begin with, for each patient, troponin T level was measured and ECG and left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) were measured by echocardiography.
16 In addition, we categorised each patient according to gender, age, previous line of anticancer treatment, cardiovascular and immune medical history, body mass index (BMI) and concomitant medication. We also collected paraclinical information: namely, creatinine level.
17 During the follow-up, we collected data for each patient monthly: troponin T level, occurrence of any cardiac outcome or other irAEs (Grade 3 or 4; CTCAE criteria [37]), and clinical response of melanoma metastasis (RECIST 1.1 criteria [38]). Diagnoses of all cardiac events were determined taking into account cardiological advice, and led to further cardiological investigation when necessary, such as ECG, echocardiography, coronarography, myocardial biopsy, and cardiac magnetic resonance imaging.
18 Serum troponin T level was defined as abnormal if > 13 ng/L. For each patient, a significant increase during follow-up was defined as an increase of 10 ng/L or more above the baseline level before the anti-PD-1 treatment. Clinicians were informed of troponin T levels at each visit.
Statistical analysis
19 In the prospective study, since the delay was not clinically relevant, we used simple tests of mean or frequency comparison, as well as logistic regression for multivariate analysis. Thus, to compare the characteristics of the groups between those who had normal or abnormal baseline troponin, and between the groups who had or not troponin T level increase during follow-up, the Fisher exact test, Wilcoxon test and logistic model were used.
Results
Retrospective study
20 Between November 2017 and April 2020, among the 183 patients treated with anti-PD-1 therapy for advanced melanoma, four patients developed cardiac AEs during immunotherapy, with a prevalence of 2.2%. The characteristics of the four patients are described in table 1. There were three cases of myocarditis and one of myocardial infarction. All the diagnoses of myocarditis were confirmed by a cardiologist, and patients were referred to a cardiologic unit. The three cases of myocarditis were diagnosed without any clinical symptom and no ECG modification. Troponin T level was increased > 500 ng/L in one case and > 1,000 ng/L in two cases. The patient who experienced myocardial infarction had typical clinical symptoms including chest pain, dyspnoea and pulmonary oedema, along with a modified ECG with segment ST depression. The three patients with myocarditis were diagnosed within less than two months of anti-PD-1 therapy. Two of them had myocardial biopsies, one of whom did not show any inflammatory infiltrate, whereas the other had focal lesions of acute myocarditis with an histiocytic and lymphocytic infiltrate, and numerous CD8+ T-cells. All of the four cardiac ailments disappeared after treatment. The details are given in table 1.
Case reports of severe cardiac AEs.
| Patient n° | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Type of cardiac AE | Myocarditis | Myocarditis | Myocarditis | Myocardial infarction |
| Baseline LVEF | > 50% | – | > 50% | > 50% |
| Prior cardiac medical history | None | Cerebrovascular accident, hypertension, aortic aneurysm | Myocardial infarction with quadruple coronary bypass | Myocardial infarction, triple coronary bypass diabetes |
| Baseline troponin level | 8 ng/L | 10 ng/L | 28 ng/L | 30 ng/L |
| Troponin peak (normal <13 ng/L) | 1004 ng/L | 584 ng/L | 1500 ng/L | 1860 ng/L |
| Clinical symptoms | None | None | None | Acute pulmonary oedema, dyspnoea, chest pain |
| CTCAE grade | 3 | 3 | 3 | 3 |
| Delay after initiation of anti-PD-1 therapy | 36 days | 28 days | 28 days | 127 days |
| Echocardiography during cardiac AE | Stable | Normal LVEF Dilatation of the right cavities | LVEF 50% | LVEF 60-65 %, stable. |
| Coronarography | Normal | – | Significant coronary stenosis No sign of acute coronary lesion | Triple vessel coronary disease Significant right artery stenosis Permeable bypasses |
| ECG | Regular sinusal rhythm, 53 bpm, narrow QRS, no repolarization disorders. No change on ECG | Regular sinusal rhythm, 85 bpm, no repolarization disorders. No change on ECG | Regular sinusal rhythm, 77 bpm, right bundle branch block, no repolarization disorders. No change on ECG | Regular sinusal rhythm, 70 bpm, ST segment depression, QT prolongation 140 ms. |
| Cardiac magnetic resonance imagery | Normal | – | Doubt between ischaemic disorder and myocarditis | No sign of myocarditis Signs of ischaemic heart disease |
| Myocardial histology | Focal lesions of acute myocarditis with a histiocytic and lymphocytic infiltrate, numerous CD8+ T-cells. | – | No inflammatory infiltrate | – |
| Discontinuation of anti-PD-1 | Yes | Yes | Yes | No |
| Treatment | IV and oral steroids 1.5 mg/kg/d with progressive decrease Abatacept 500mg/14d, 6 cycles | IV and oral steroids 2 mg/kg/d with progressive decrease | IV steroids 1000 mg/d 3 days Oral steroids 1,5mg/kg/d Plasmatic exchange, 2 cycles Abatacept 20 mg/kg, 3 cycles | Double platelet anti-aggregant |
| AE evolution | Resolution | Resolution | Resolution | Resolution |
| Other irAEs | Thyroiditis Neuropathy | Hepatitis (mycofenolate mofetil therapy initiated) | None | Nephropathy |
| Melanoma response to anti-PD-1 therapy | Progression | Complete response | – | Complete response |
Case reports of severe cardiac AEs.
–: no data; bpm: beats per minute; ms: millisecondsProspective study: troponin T serum levels in patients treated with anti-PD-1
21 Fifty-two patients starting anti-PD-1 treatment were included in this part of the study. Median follow-up was 219 days (14-790 days). Clinical characteristics are described in table 2.
Clinical features of patients regarding troponin levels at the time of anti-PD1 initiation.
| Characteristics | Patients with abnormal troponin baseline level (n = 14) n (%) | Patients with normal troponin baseline level (n = 38) n (%) | All patients (n = 52) n (%) | p value |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age in years, median (range) | 80 (63-92) | 63 (32-89) | 69 (32-92) | 0.02 |
| Gender, male/female | 9/5 (64%/36%) | 14/24 (37%/63%) | 23/29 (44%/56%) | 0.12 |
| Previous cardiac events Cardiac failure Myocardial infarction Heart rhythm disorders Valvulopathy | 10 (71%) 2 (14%) 1 (7%) 8 (57%) | 5 (13%) 1 (3%) 2 (5%) 3 (8%) 1 (3%) | 15 (29) 3 (6) 3 (6) 11 (21) 1 (2) | 0.0001 0.001 |
| Previous vascular disorders Hypertension Vascular cerebral accident Thromboembolic disease Peripheral arterial occlusive disease Chronic kidney disease | 13 (93%) 9 (64%) 3 (21%) 1 (7%) 2 (14%) 7 (50%) | 17 (45%) 3 (8%) 3 (8%) 2 (5%) 1 (3%) | 30 (58) 12 (23) 6 (12) 3 (6) 2 (4) 8 (15) | 0.001 0.004 |
| Diabetes | 4 (28 %) | 2 (5%) | 6 (12) | 0.03 |
| Previous autoimmunitiy | 0 | 3 (8%) | 3 (6) | 0.54 |
| BMI, median (range) | 28.2 (22-35) | 25.7 (17.6-42) | 26.2 (17.6 - 42) | 0.101 |
| Cancer stage: - IIIc - IV | 3 (21%) 11 (79 %) | 13 (34%) 25 (66%) | 16 (31) 36 (69) | |
| Thoracic metastasis | 7 (50%) | 9 (24%) | 16 (31) | 0.094 |
| Prior lines of treatment: - Immunotherapy - Chemotherapy - Targeted therapy | 4 (28%) 2 (14%) 3 (21%) | 11 (29%) 4 (11%) 12 (32%) | 15 (29) 6 (12) 15 (29) | 1 0.66 0.73 |
| Total duration of treatment in days, mean (IQR) | 248 (128-324) | 239 (96-334) | 241 (98-332) | 0.73 |
| Final response to anti-PD1 Progressive disease Stability Partial response Complete response | 5 (35%) 2 (14%) 2 (14%) 4 (28%) | 19 (50%) 1 (3%) 4 (11%) 9 (24%) | 24 (46) 3 (6) 6 (12) 13 (25) |
Clinical features of patients regarding troponin levels at the time of anti-PD1 initiation.
22 Before starting treatment, for all patients, serum troponin levels were measured and patients underwent an electrocardiogram (ECG) and an echocardiography (except 10 patients) before starting anti-PD-1 therapy.
23 Before anti-PD-1, the following data were gleaned from the 52 patients. Fourteen (26.4%) had a high troponin T level (> 13 ng/L) (table 2). Twenty-two (42%) had abnormal ECG; 11 (50%) had bundle branch blocks, five (23%) had atrial fibrillation, one (5%) had tachycardia, two (9%) had left anterior hemiblocks, two (5%) had atrioventricular block, and one had negative T waves in the precordial derivations (5%), and 11 of them (50%) had an elevated troponin T level.
24 Nine of the 14 (64 %) patients with abnormal baseline troponin level had a BMI > 25, versus 21/38 (55%) with normal baseline level (< 13 ng/L). Twenty-six patients had received prior lines of treatment before initiation of anti-PD-1 therapy, presented in table 2 (17 patients had had one prior line and nine had two or more). The groups at baseline were compared. Based on the univariate analysis, the following factors were reported to significantly increase the risk of elevated baseline troponin T level: older age; cardiac history, and more specifically, heart rhythm disorders; vascular history; diabetes; ECG abnormalities at baseline; and chronic renal failure (table 2).
25 Based on the multivariate analysis, older age and cardiac history were the only factors which were significantly associated with an abnormal troponin T baseline level.
Follow-up
26 Fifty-one patients were followed with an ECG and monthly T troponin serum measurements. Follow-up was not possible for one patient who died two weeks after anti-PD-1 initiation. Eight patients developed non-cardiological irAEs. An increase in troponin T level was reported in 14 patients (27%) (table 2). During the follow-up period, an increase in troponin T level was noted in six patients among the 14, among whom two patients had clinical symptoms. In only one patient, the increase in troponin T level was associated with ECG modification, which was a segment ST depression. The mean delay for developing a troponin T increase after treatment initiation for the six patients was 93 days (within a range of 30 to 145 days). Four of six (67%) of these patients had a cardiovascular history and abnormal baseline ECG. The rise in troponin T levels was between 10 and 1,830 ng/L, with a median of 18.5 ng/L.
27 For the two patients who had clinical cardiac signs associated with the increase in troponin T level, one developed an acute pulmonary oedema secondary to myocardial infarction (troponin: 1,860 ng/L), occurring five months after treatment initiation. This patient had a severe cardiovascular history with several prior myocardial infarctions. Two platelet aggregation inhibitors were initiated which permitted clinical improvement. This was the only patient who experienced a second irAE, corresponding to immune-related kidney disease, which occurred several months later. Anti-PD-1 therapy was not discontinued, and there was no recurrence of the cardiac event and the therapy resulted in complete remission of the melanoma. For the second patient, the increase in troponin T level (84 ng/L with a baseline level of 43 ng/L) was not associated with a cardiac problem but rather septic shock which was treated with antibiotherapy. When the acute attack resolved, troponin T levels decreased to baseline levels and the anti-PD-1 therapy was pursued (table 3).
Characteristics of patients with significant troponin increase.
| Patient | 10 | 16 | 30 | 32 | 38 | 41 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age at treatment onset | 63 | 78 | 87 | 70 | 72 | 74 |
| Troponin baseline | 30 | 34 | 58 | 3 | 3 | 43 |
| Troponin peak | 1860 | 44 | 68 | 24 | 19 | 84 |
| CTCAE grade | 3 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 |
| ECG modification at troponin elevation | ST segment depression | None | None | None | None | None, complete atrio-ventricular block, stable. |
| Clinical symptoms | Dyspnoea, OMI, chest pain | None | None | None | None | Septic shock |
| Delay in troponin increase (days) | 127 | 136 | 140 | 30 | 56 | 55 |
| Cardiovascular history | Myocardial infarction, diabetes, chronic renal failure | Aortic stenosis, hypertension, chronic renal failure | Atrial fibrillation, hypertension, chronic renal failure | None | None | atrioventricular block 3, hypertension |
| Other irAEs | Nephropathy | None | None | None | None | None |
| Best response to anti-PD-1 | Complete response | Partial response | Progressive disease | Complete response | Progressive disease | Partial response |
| Cardiac investigation | Ischaemic heart disease on cardiac RMI, artery stenosis or coronarography | None | None | None | None | None |
| Treatment | Double platelet anti-aggregant. | None | None | None | None | Antibiotics for septic shock |
Characteristics of patients with significant troponin increase.
28 The four other patients with an increase in T troponin level did not experience any symptoms or abnormality on ECG. The mean increase in serum troponin T levels was 14.3 +/- 5.3 ng/L. For these patients, anti-PD-1 therapy was continued without any cardiovascular event during follow-up.
29 In summary, in the prospective cohort of 52 patients, only one patient developed a high level of troponin T resulting in a myocardial infarction.
30 During this follow-up period, three factors were also significantly associated with increased troponin T level: diabetes (p = 0.007), previous myocardial infarction (p = 0.016), and long duration of anti-PD-1 therapy (p = 0.01).
Discussion
31 The aims of this study were first to assess the prevalence of patients with an adverse cardiac outcome in our retrospective cohort of patients treated with anti-PD-1. The second part was a prospective study of 52 patients to define whether troponin T levels might be a good marker to detect a cardiovascular AEs in patients treated with anti-PD-1 drugs, before and during treatment.
32 Concerning our retrospective study, the prevalence of severe cardiac AEs in patients treated with anti-PD-1 was low; only 2.2% (4/183 patients). However, this prevalence is higher than that in the literature. Clinical trials involving anti-PD-1 therapies for melanoma (such as KEYNOTE and CHECKMATE pivotal studies [5, 10, 11, 39-41]) have, as yet, not revealed any Stage 3 or 4 cardiac-related adverse events such as heart attack or myocarditis. However, based on our two trials, it is not possible to affirm whether Stage 1 or 2 adverse cardiac events can be formally eliminated.
33 AEs related to other anti-PD-1-treated cancers rarely involved cardiac events that were not deemed to be linked to the treatment. The prevalence of myocarditis was reported to be 0.09% based on the Bristol Myers Squibb safety database for nivolumab and ipilimumab in combination, and 0.06% with nivolumab as a single therapy [26]. Retrospective studies showed a higher prevalence of cardiac events in patients treated with ICIs; 0.4% and 0.5% in two studies involving patients receiving anti-PD-1 therapy [3, 32]. This might suggest that patients in real-life settings with previous cardiac events are more likely to experience adverse cardiac events due to anti-PD-1 therapy than patients selected in clinical studies who present fewer comorbidities and are often excluded from testing.
34 Concerning the four cases of our retrospective study, three of them experienced these adverse events shortly after drug initiation (28 to 36 days) in accordance with the literature which reports a mean delay of between 17 and 39 days, and more than 80% within the three months after starting anti-PD-1 [26, 29, 36, 42].
35 An important point on the practical level is that, in three patients, the increase in troponin T level was reported without any clinical sign, but lead to the diagnosis of myocarditis and the discontinuation of the anti-PD-1 drug. These three patients were given intravenous steroids, then oral steroids (1 to 2 mg/kg/d) with progressive tapering. Two of them showed a relapse with a decrease in oral steroids, and were treated successfully with abatacept. One patient developed a myocardial infarction which did not need any immunosuppressive agent for resolution.
36 The main strategy used to treat ICI-associated cardiotoxicity targets the T-cell response. Glucocorticoid therapy is considered as the first line of treatment, at an initial dose of 1-2 mg/kg. However, for some patients, alternative treatment is necessary [43]. Many treatments, such as plasmapheresis, intravenous immunoglobulins, antithymocyte globulin, mycofenolate mofetil, tacrolimus, infliximab, and abatacept [25], have been offered, but for the moment, no consensus has been obtained and guidelines are lacking [33].
37 The second part of our study was based on a prospective study revealing that before any treatment with anti-PD-1, patients may have had an increase in troponin T baseline level. Based on a meta-analysis of several studies of patients with abnormal troponin levels above 14 ng/L, 3.4 to 19% had abnormal troponin T levels [44].
38 In our study this applied to 27% of the patients. This basal increase in troponin T level, before anti-PD-1 treatment, could be linked to events such as physical exercise or chronic kidney failure [45, 46]. Among our 14 patients with basal increase in troponin T, seven (50%) had renal dysfunction (glomerular filtration rate <60). The rate of false positives in our hospital was estimated at less than 3% and close to 0 for values that were two-fold higher than normal values. In all cases, ECG and echography are useful tools to rule out false positives. CPK may also be of interest for the detection of false positives, but unfortunately we did not perform this biological test.
39 Another explanation of this non-symptomatic troponin elevation could be linked to subclinical inflammatory processes, such as subclinical myocarditis, however, all patients underwent ECG and cardiac echography before starting treatment. Thus, these results show that it is important to know the basal troponin T level for the follow-up of patients. Only one other prospective study has been performed on lung cancer in 2018 [47] with a similar number of patients (n = 59). The authors reported a lower percentage (5.1%) of elevated troponin I baseline levels before anti-PD-1 treatment.
40 During the follow-up period of our cohort, we noted an increase introponin T level in six patients (11.5%) with the detection of a myocardial infarction in one patient and septic shock in another. Thus, a low increase in T troponin level (less than two-fold) with spontaneous normalization does not seem to be a contraindication to continuing anti-PD-1 treatment.
41 Among the six patients with an increase in T troponin level, none showed new associated ECG abnormalities. Furthermore, in the retrospective cohort, in the three patients diagnosed with myocarditis, the same phenomenon was noted. This suggests that troponin T levels may well be more sensitive than ECG for the detection of cardiac adverse events.
42 A comparison between groups at baseline showed that older age, cardiac or vascular history and diabetes were more often associated with a subnormal baseline level of troponin T.
43 During the follow-up period under anti-PD-1 treatment, diabetes and cardiac history were still associated with increased troponin T levels, together with a long duration of anti-PD-1 therapy, thus indicating that the cardiac follow up should be stricter with a long prescription of anti-PD-1.
44 Concerning the other prospective cohort with lung cancer, 14 patients had an increase in troponin I level during follow-up (11 with a normal baseline level). Thus, our results are in accordance with these previous results, although the troponin subtypes were different [47]. Both T and I subtypes seem to be linked to cardiovascular events; troponin I seems to be more related to coronary diseases [48]. Regarding mortality, troponin T seems to be more related to overall mortality, whereas troponin I is more related to cardiovascular mortality [49].
45 At the pathophysiological level, animal studies have demonstrated that PD-1 deletion causes inflammation of the myocardium [50]. In PD-1 deficient mice, Okazaki et al. showed that autoantibodies against cardiac troponin I were responsible for dilated cardiomyopathy [51]. ICI-associated myocarditis might be initiated by the release of cardiac antigens such as troponin into the circulation. This antigen release might be the consequence of a deleterious process, such as viral myocardial injury [47]. The primary inflammation, exacerbated by ICI-enhanced immunity, could initiate a worsening cycle due to further cardiac antigen release [30]. Some patients may be less sensitive to ICI-intensified autoimmunity and a more serious primary defect may be necessary to cause the inflammation to spread and lead to a symptomatic irAE. In our cohort, at baseline, we identified 10/14 in whom C-reactive protein (CRP) had been measured. Among them, three had increased CRP above 20 ng/L.
46 In our study, 26 patients had received previous treatments. In both groups of patients with or without abnormal troponin T baseline levels, the number of patients with previous therapeutics for melanoma was the same, including those who already received ICIs such as anti-CTLA-4. In addition, targeted therapies with BRAF and MEK inhibitors are known to decrease LVEF, but not increase troponin levels [52].
47 In addition to troponin, another marker of interest could be NT-proBNP, often used in cases of cardiac irAEs associated with ICIs [53].
48 In conclusion, our study suggests that the prevalence of cardiac events might be higher in real-life settings than in clinical trials. Monitoring could allow us to detect adverse events related to anti-PD-1 therapy earlier, as the increase in troponin T seems to be an early event before cardiac manifestation. However, the interpretation of troponin T level requires knowledge of basal dosage established before any treatment with immunotherapy. A mild increase is not a contraindication to anti-PD-1 if ECG and cardiac echography are normal. Other biological investigations, such as testing for troponin I, NT-proBNP and CPK, could be interesting to consider in future studies which may confirm these results.
Disclosure
49 Funding sources: none. Conflicts of interest: none.
- [1] Queirolo P., Boutros A., Tanda E., Spagnolo F., Quaglino P. Immune-checkpoint inhibitors for the treatment of metastatic melanoma: a model of cancer immunotherapy. Sem Cancer Biol. 2019;59:290-297.
- [2] Herrscher H., Robert C. Immune checkpoint inhibitors in melanoma in the metastatic, neoadjuvant, and adjuvant setting. Curr Opin Oncol. 2020;32:106-113.
- [3] Zimmer L., Goldinger S.M., Hofmann L. Neurological, respiratory, musculoskeletal, cardiac and ocular side-effects of anti-PD-1 therapy. Eur J Cancer. 2016;60:210-225.
- [4] Sznol M., Ferrucci P.F., Hogg D. Pooled analysis safety profile of nivolumab and ipilimumab combination therapy in patients with advanced melanoma. J Clin Oncol. 2017;35:3815-3822.
- [5] Hodi F.S., Chiarion-Sileni V., Gonzalez R. Nivolumab plus ipilimumab or nivolumab alone versus ipilimumab alone in advanced melanoma (CheckMate 067): 4-year outcomes of a multicentre, randomised, phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol. 2018;19:1480-1492.
- [6] Lacouture M., Sibaud V. Toxic side effects of targeted therapies and immunotherapies affecting the skin, oral mucosa, hair, and nails. Am J Clin Dermatol. 2018;19:31-39.
- [7] Weber J.S., Postow M., Lao C.D., Schadendorf D. Management of adverse events following treatment with anti-programmed death-1 agents. Oncologist. 2016;21:1230-1240.
- [8] Varricchi G., Marone G., Mercurio V., Galdiero M.R., Bonaduce D., Tocchetti C.G. Immune checkpoint inhibitors and cardiac toxicity: an emerging issue. Curr Med Chem. 2018;25:1327-1339.
- [9] Herrmann J. Adverse cardiac effects of cancer therapies: cardiotoxicity and arrhythmia. Nat Rev Cardiol. 2020;17:474-502.
- [10] Weber J.S., D’Angelo S.P., Minor D. Nivolumab versus chemotherapy in patients with advanced melanoma who progressed after anti-CTLA-4 treatment (CheckMate 037): a randomised, controlled, open-label, phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol. 2015;16:375-384.
- [11] Robert C., Long G.V., Brady B. Nivolumab in previously untreated melanoma without BRAF mutation. N Engl J Med. 2015;372:320-330.
- [12] Ascierto P.A., Long G.V., Robert C. Survival outcomes in patients with previously untreated wild-type advanced melanoma treated with nivolumab therapy: three-year follow-up of a randomized phase 3 trial. JAMA Oncol. 2019;5:187. BRAF
- [13] Hamid O., Puzanov I., Dummer R. Final analysis of a randomised trial comparing pembrolizumab versus investigator-choice chemotherapy for ipilimumab-refractory advanced melanoma. Eur J Cancer. 2017;86:37-45.
- [14] Burtness B., Harrington K.J., Greil R. Pembrolizumab alone or with chemotherapy versus cetuximab with chemotherapy for recurrent or metastatic squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (KEYNOTE-048): a randomised, open-label, phase 3 study. Lancet. 2019;394:1915-1928.
- [15] Larkin J., Chiarion-Sileni V., Gonzalez R. Combined nivolumab and ipilimumab or monotherapy in untreated melanoma. New Engl J Med. 2015;373:23-34.
- [16] Menzies A.M., Johnson D.B., Ramanujam S. Anti-PD-1 therapy in patients with advanced melanoma and preexisting autoimmune disorders or major toxicity with ipilimumab. Ann Oncol. 2017;28:368-376.
- [17] Johnson D.B., Balko J.M., Compton M.L. Fulminant myocarditis with combination immune checkpoint blockade. N Engl J Med. 2016;375:1749-1755.
- [18] Ansari-Gilani K., Tirumani S.H., Smith D.A. Myocarditis associated with immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy: a case report of three patients. Emerg Radiol. 2020;27:455-460.
- [19] Salem J.-E., Allenbach Y., Vozy A. Abatacept for severe immune checkpoint inhibitor–associated myocarditis. New Engl J Med. 2019;380:2377-2379.
- [20] Salem J.-E., Manouchehri A., Moey M. Cardiovascular toxicities associated with immune checkpoint inhibitors: an observational, retrospective, pharmacovigilance study. Lancet Oncol. 2018;19:1579-1589.
- [21] Reddy N., Moudgil R., Lopez-Mattei J.C. Progressive and reversible conduction disease with checkpoint inhibitors. Can J Cardiol. 2017;33:1335.e13-5.
- [22] Heinzerling L., Ott P.A., Hodi F.S. Cardiotoxicity associated with CTLA4 and PD1 blocking immunotherapy. J Immunother Cancer. 2016;4:50.
- [23] Escudier M., Cautela J., Malissen N. Clinical features, management, and outcomes of immune checkpoint inhibitor–related cardiotoxicity. Circulation. 2017;136:2085-2087.
- [24] Läubli H., Balmelli C., Bossard M., Pfister O., Glatz K., Zippelius A. Acute heart failure due to autoimmune myocarditis under pembrolizumab treatment for metastatic melanoma. J Immunother Cancer. 2015;3:11.
- [25] Geisler B.P., Raad R.A., Esaian D., Sharon E., Schwartz D.R. Apical ballooning and cardiomyopathy in a melanoma patient treated with ipilimumab: a case of takotsubo-like syndrome. J Immunother Cancer. 2015;3:4.
- [26] Johnson C.B., Ong M. Immune checkpoint inhibitors: game changing cancer therapy with a cardiac cost. what are the mechanisms and unresolved questions in cardiotoxicity? Can J Cardiol. 2018;34:970-971.
- [27] Guo X, Wang H., Zhou J. Clinical manifestation and management of immune checkpoint inhibitor-associated cardiotoxicity. Thorac Cancer. 2020;11:475-480.
- [28] Yang S., Asnani A. Cardiotoxicities associated with immune checkpoint inhibitors. Curr Probl Cancer. 2018;42:422-432.
- [29] Wang D.Y., Salem J.-E., Cohen J.V. Fatal toxic effects associated with immune checkpoint inhibitors: a systematic review and meta-analysis. JAMA Oncol. 2018;4:1721-1728.
- [30] Mir H., Alhussein M., Alrashidi S. cardiac complications associated with checkpoint inhibition: a systematic review of the literature in an important emerging area. Can J Cardiol. 2018;34:1059-1068.
- [31] Guha A., Al-Kindi S., Jain P., Tashtish N., ElAmm C., Oliveira G. Association between myocarditis and other immune-related adverse events secondary to immune checkpoint inhibitor use. Int J Cancer. 2020;147:1753-1754.
- [32] Mahmood S.S., Fradley M.G., Cohen J.V. Myocarditis in patients treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2018;71:1755-1764.
- [33] Brahmer J.R., Lacchetti C., Thompson J.A. Management of immune-related adverse events in patients treated with immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy: American Society of Clinical Oncology Clinical Practice Guideline Summary. J Oncol Pract. 2018;14:247-249.
- [34] Al-Otaiby M.A., Al-Amri H.S., Al-Moghairi A.M. The clinical significance of cardiac troponins in medical practice. J Saudi Heart Assoc. 2011;23:3-11.
- [35] Gherasim L. Troponins in heart failure - a perpetual challenge. Maedica (Buchar). 2019;14:371-377.
- [36] Pradhan R., Nautiyal A., Singh S. Diagnosis of immune checkpoint inhibitor-associated myocarditis: a systematic review. Int J Cardiol. 2019;296:113-121.
- [37] Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) | Protocol Development | CTEP (cited 29 April2020). Available at: https: //ctep.cancer.gov/protocolDevelopment/electronic_applications/ctc.htm.
- [38] Eisenhauer E.A., Therasse P., Bogaerts J. New response evaluation criteria in solid tumours: revised RECIST guideline (version 1.1). Eur J Cancer. 2009;45:228-247.
- [39] Ribas A., Puzanov I., Dummer R. Pembrolizumab versus investigator-choice chemotherapy for ipilimumab-refractory melanoma (KEYNOTE-002): a randomised, controlled, phase 2 trial. Lancet Oncol. 2015;16:908-918.
- [40] Robert C., Schachter J., Long G.V. Pembrolizumab versus ipilimumab in advanced melanoma. N Engl J Med. 2015;372:2521-2532.
- [41] Hodi F.S., Chesney J., Pavlick A.C. Combined nivolumab and ipilimumab versus ipilimumab alone in patients with advanced melanoma: 2-year overall survival outcomes in a multicentre, randomised, controlled, phase 2 trial. Lancet Oncol. 2016;17:1558-1568.
- [42] Agrawal N., Khunger A., Vachhani P. Cardiac toxicity associated with immune checkpoint inhibitors: case series and review of the literature. Case Rep Oncol. 2019;12:260-276.
- [43] Hu J.-R., Florido R., Lipson E.J. Cardiovascular toxicities associated with immune checkpoint inhibitors. Cardiovasc Res. 2019;115:854-868.
- [44] Sze J., Mooney J., Barzi F., Hillis G.S., Chow C.K. Cardiac troponin and its relationship to cardiovascular outcomes in community populations–a systematic review and meta-analysis. Heart Lung Circ. 2016;25:217-228.
- [45] Gresslien T., Agewall S. Troponin and exercise. Int J Cardiol. 2016;221:609-621.
- [46] Vasudevan A., Singer A.J., DeFilippi C. Renal function and scaled troponin in patients presenting to the emergency department with symptoms of myocardial infarction. Am J Nephrol. 2017;45:304-309.
- [47] Sarocchi M., Grossi F., Arboscello E. Serial troponin for early detection of nivolumab cardiotoxicity in advanced non-small cell lung cancer patients. Oncologist. 2018;23:936-942.
- [48] Welsh P., Preiss D., Hayward C. Cardiac troponin T and troponin I in the general population. Circulation. 2019;139:2754-2764.
- [49] Árnadóttir Á., Falk Klein C., Iversen K. Head-to-head comparison of cardiac troponin T and troponin I in patients without acute coronary syndrome: a systematic review. Biomarkers. 2017;22:701-708.
- [50] Nishimura H., Okazaki T., Tanaka Y. Autoimmune dilated cardiomyopathy in PD-1 receptor-deficient mice. Science. 2001;291:319-322.
- [51] Okazaki T., Tanaka Y., Nishio R. Autoantibodies against cardiac troponin I are responsible for dilated cardiomyopathy in PD-1-deficient mice. Nat Med. 2003;9:1477-1483.
- [52] Mincu R.I., Mahabadi A.A., Michel L. Cardiovascular adverse events associated with BRAF and MEK inhibitors: a systematic review and meta-analysis. JAMA Netw Open. 2019;2:e198890.
- [53] Lyon A.R., Yousaf N., Battisti N.M.L., Moslehi J., Larkin J. Immune checkpoint inhibitors and cardiovascular toxicity. Lancet Oncol. 2018;19:e447-e458.
Publisher keywords: adverse events, anti-PD-1, cardiac, immune checkpoint inhibitors, myocarditis
Uploaded: 09/23/2024
https://doi.org/10.1684/ejd.2021.4009